Search this site

 

The Gomco clamp, 1935 Print

Production line efficiency reaches the penis


In 1935 Hiram S. Yellen (an obstetrician and gynecologist) and Aaron Goldstein (an inventor) collaborated in the invention of a new circumcision  instrument which they called the Gomco clamp. Goldstein produced and marketed the device through his private company – the Goldstein Manufacturing Company (Gomco) – and patented it in 1940.  They used the friendly pages of American medical journals to urge the necessity for early circumcision, and to promote their product as the best and most efficient means of performing it. It was a very successful example of medical entrepreneurship!

On this page are collected a number of documents relating to the history of the Gomco clamp.

Yellen’s original article
My commentary: The T-model penis
Julian Wan’s tribute the Gomco clamp
Warning from US Food and Drug Administration
Correspondence between John Dalton and Julian Wan
Recall of Pakistani "Gomco-like" device
One operator's confession
The Gomco clamp as an S&M toy
Further information

Bloodless circumcision of the newborn

Circumcision is one of the oldest operations recorded in the history of medicine, and while the method of procedure has kept pace with medical progress in general, there has always been the possibility of a haemorrhage with each case. Medical literature records many fatal haemorrhages and many infections as a result of circumcision of the newborn, and it is known that 2 per cent of all skin cancers are penis cancers. With this in mind we set about to develop a safe and simple apparatus for the performance of this operation, with the result that we now have a clamp which not only eliminates the possibility of haemorrhage, but also restricts the minimum chance of infection without the use of sutures.

About a year ago Aaron Goldstein of this city [New York] developed a clamp  which we have used in many cases. This efficient instrument is small, compact, light as strength will permit, and can be operated without an assistant. The technic is quite simple, and the time required is less than that by any other method. With the use of this clamp we never employ sutures, no bleeding is encountered, and it leaves a clean-cut incision which heals perfectly in 36 hours with practically no chance of infection because the mucous membrane and skin are securely clamped together.

Fig. 3 is the clamp itself, and Fig. 1 and 2 are diagrams showing the procedure. The following instruments and material are all that is really required: the clamp, 2 small haemostats, a probe with a flattened end, a scissor with one blunt blade, an abscess knife or sharp pointed scalpel (No. 12 Bard-Parker blade is ideal), sterile Vaseline, and Vaseline gauze.

Method

After properly cleansing the penis (E) and pubis, the dorsal aspect of the prepuce (A) is put on a stretch by grasping it on either side of the median line with a pair of haemostats. A flat probe, anointed with Vaseline, is then inserted between the prepuce and the glans to separate adherent mucous membrane. The prepuce is then gently drawn backward, exposing the entire glans penis. This is again cleaned. In case where the prepuce is drawn tightly over the glans, a partial dorsal slit will facilitate applying the cone of draw stud over the glans [?? sic]. (Note: If too long a slit is made, the cone has a tendency to slip of the glans. The slit should, therefore, be made only sufficiently long to enable the cone to be easily applied.)

After anointing the inside of the cone (B) , it is placed over the glans, allowing enough of the mucous membrane to fit below the cone so that too much is not removed. The prepuce is then pulled through and above the bevel hole in the platform (F), and clamped in place. In this way the prepuce is crushed against the cone, causing haemostasis. We allow this pressure to remain five minutes, and in older children slightly longer. The excess of the prepuce is then cut with a sharp knife without any danger of cutting the glans, which is always protected by the cone portion of the instrument, leaving a very fine one-thirty-second of an inch ribbon-like membrane formed between the new union of the skin and mucous membrane. The pressure is then released. The circumcision is completed and the penis covered with Vaseline gauze.

No anaesthesia is used.

On children older than twelve months, we find it advisable to insert a few sutures. At this date we have performed more than 500 circumcisions on the newborn and as yet have not encountered any infection or haemorrhage.

Hiram S. Yellen, "Bloodless circumcision of the newborn", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 30, 1935, p. 146-7


Commentary: The T-model penis

The Gomco clamp was heavily advertised in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1935 and at its annual meeting in 1936. It soon proved very popular with American physicians, and established itself as the most commonly used method for early circumcision. Although Yellen had warned that the device should be used cautiously so that "not too much" of the prepuce was amputated, the design of the device allowed any quantity of tissue to be trapped and excised, depending on how far the penile skin was stretched between the ring and the cone. The temptation was always to pull more rather than less. The outcome was that the American method of circumcision became increasingly severe, leading to the "high and tight" look in which about 50 per cent of the surface tissue of the penis is cut off, and the remaining skin is stretched thin, like the membrane of a drum. The instrument remains in frequent use today.


Julian Wan’s tribute

Yellen and Goldstein’s work was the subject of an enthusiastic, not to say rhapsodic, eulogy by Julian Wan, published in the journal Urology in 2002. Wan praises the Gomco clamp for its "longevity and functional elegance", and as "a model of excellence in design and innovation". He notes that the device can exert from "800 to 20,000 pounds of hemostatic force against the prepuce", thus crushing it so effectively that stitches are rarely necessary. Wan also explains why Yellen was so keen to develop a new and simple circumcision method. Although American physicians had been demanding universal male circumcision since around 1910, they met strong resistance because all the available methods were clumsy, difficult and bloody, and often had unfortunate outcomes, such as dangerous bleeding, infection and death. By the mid-1930s the high level of injury and death had produced such disenchantment among British doctors that many were calling for the operation to be entirely abandoned; while in the USA Dr Winfield Scott Hugh recommended that it be treated as a major operation to be performed under local or general anaesthetic, and that every point of bleeding should be meticulously sutured.

It is easy to see that if circumcision was classified as such serious surgery it would remain only a minority practice and could never become as widespread as its advocates desired. It could certainly not be regarded as a simple, "routine" procedure performed at or soon after birth by obstetricians; it would rather be a serious operation reserved to surgeons, and correspondingly more expensive and less popular. Like Kistler’s clamp, Yellen and Goldstein’s device was intended to reduce objections to circumcision and to promote its performance throughout the nation. Its purpose was to silence the critics and ensure that Yellen’s professional fraction (the ob-gyns) got the job. In retrospect we can see (though Wan did not) that the whole affair was about business success and professional turf, and had very little to do with children’s health.

The T-model penis

Wan reports that Goldstein was inspired by watching a mechanic at work with a tyre lever on a Ford motor car. In a broader perspective, his invention may be seen as part of the drive for speed and efficiency so characteristic of American industry in the 1920s, and the application of Fordist production line techniques to surgery. Circumcised penises would henceforth roll out of the hospitals with the same speed and efficiency as Henry Ford’s cars poured out of his factories, all as standardised and uniform as the T-model itself.

Wan’s article is well worth studying, both for its historical information and the insights it affords into the standards of medical ethics current among American urologists. A pdf copy may be downloaded here. (PDF 157KB)

Image


Warning from FDA

Contrary to Yellen’s claims and Wan’s breezy affirmations, however, the Gomco clamp has not been free from complications, and the literature offers many cases where its use has led to bleeding, infection, and amputation of the glans or entire penis. The following warning was issued by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the US Food and Drug Administration on 29 August 2000. They had received no fewer than 105 reports of injuries between July 1996 and January 2000 alone, including laceration, hemorrhage, penile amputation, and urethral damage.

Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Food and Drug Administration
29 August 2000

Dear Colleague

This letter is to alert you to the potential for injury from two commonly used circumcision clamps, the Gomco/gomco-type and Mogen/mogen-type clamps. Both are widely used during circumcision to remove the foreskin while protecting the glans penis.

Although research suggests that circumcision is generally a safe procedure, we are concerned that some serious device-related complications have occurred. We received 105 reports of injuries involving circumcision clamps between July 1996 and January 2000 [1]. These have included laceration, hemorrhage, penile amputation, and urethral damage.

We are providing recommendations below that can help avoid these complications.

Nature of the Problem

Gomco and Gomco-type Clamps

The use of Gomco and gomco-type clamps that have been reassembled by users with parts from different manufacturers, or that have bent parts or mismatched components, has led to clamps breaking, slipping, falling off during use, tearing penile tissue or failing to make a tight seal. Please note that although Gomco and gomco-type clamps may appear to have interchangeable parts, these parts may not always be safely interchanged because they may vary slightly in dimensions.

Mogen and Mogen-type Clamps

The use of Mogen and mogen-type clamps that have jaw gap dimensions greater than those in the manufacturer’s specifications, or use of clamps inappropriately sized for patients, has led to patient injuries. In such cases, the clamp may allow too much tissue to be drawn through the opening of the device, thus facilitating the removal of an excessive amount of foreskin and in some cases, a portion of the glans penis.

Recommendations

General

Before performing a circumcision procedure, examine the clamp to determine that all parts are available, undamaged, and within the manufacturer's specification.

Gomco and Gomco-type clamps

If you cannot be certain that a clamp component is part of the original clamp or if the clamp has stripped threads, a warped or bent base plate, a bent arm, twisted forks, or a scored or nicked bell, either contact the device manufacturer to obtain replacement parts [2] or discard the clamp.

When requesting a replacement part, obtain the assurance of the manufacturer or supplier that the part ordered is compatible with the other components of your device. Do not substitute parts from different clamp manufacturers.

Make sure that you reassemble a clamp from only its own parts. Do not mix up parts from different clamps, even from the same manufacturer, unless the manufacturer has assured you that the parts are interchangeable.

If you choose to mark clamp parts to assure that you correctly reassemble them, ask the manufacturer about the best way to do this, because some marking methods may weaken the device or compromise your ability to sterilize it.

Mogen and Mogen-type clamps

Ensure that the clamp being used is appropriate for the patient size. Some manufacturers have two sizes of clamps, one for adults and the other for infants.

Periodically measure the gap between the device’s clamping jaws to ensure that it is within the manufacturer’s specification. [3]  Using a device with an inappropriate jaw gap could allow the tip of the penis to be drawn through the clamp with the foreskin and inadvertently severed or injured.

Reporting Adverse Events to FDA

The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (SMDA) requires hospitals and other user facilities to report deaths and serious injuries associated with the use of medical devices. This means that if the use of a Gomco/gomco-type clamp or a Mogen/mogen-type clamp result in a death or serious injury, you must report that event. We request that you follow the procedures established by your facility for such mandatory reporting.

If a circumcision clamp malfunctions, you can report this directly to the manufacturer. Alternatively, you can report directly to MedWatch, the FDA’s voluntary reporting program. You may submit reports to MedWatch four ways: online to https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/ by telephone at 1-800-FDA-1088; by FAX at 1-800-FDA-0178, or by mail to MedWatch, Food and Drug Administration, HF-2, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.

Getting More information

If you have questions regarding this letter, please contact Sherry Purvis-Wynn, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics (HFZ-510), 1350 Piccard Drive, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, by fax at 301-594-2968, or by e-mail at phann@cdrh.fda.gov. Additionally, a voice mail message may be left at 301-594-0650, and your call will be returned as soon as possible.

All of the FDA medical device postmarket safety notifications can be found on the World Wide Web at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety.html. Postmarket safety notifications can also be obtained through e-mail on the day they are released by subscribing to our list server. To subscribe, send a message to fdalists@archie.fda.gov. In the body of the text, type "subscribe dev-alert".

Sincerely yours,
David W. Feigal, Jr, MD, MPH
Director
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Food and Drug Administration
[29 August 2000]

References and Additional Information

1.  FDA MedWatch Reports, July 1992 through January 2000.

2.  IPM Procedure: Circumcision Clamps, Health Devices 2000 January; 29(1):22-3.

3.  Hazard: Routine inspection needed for scissors-type circumcision clamps, Health Devices 1999 Mar; 28(3):115-6.

4.  Hazard: Incompatibility of different brands of Gomco-Type circumcision clamps. Health Devices 1997 Feb; 26(2):76-7.

5.  Hazard: Amputations with use of adult-size scissors-type circumcision clamps on infants. Health Devices 1995 Jul; 4(7):286-7.

6.  Hazard: Damaged Allied Healthcare Products Gomco circumcision clamp. Health Devices 1993 Mar; 22(3):154-5.

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/circumcision.html


Correspondence between John Dalton and Julian Wan

This report was the subject of some correspondence between John Dalton, of Norm-UK, and Dr Wan, who confessed that while he was aware of "the various types of problems with both the Mogen and the GOMCO clamps", he was not aware of the FDA’s warning.

Dalton's question

-- Original Message --
From:  John D Dalton [mailto:john.dalton@herdwick.net]
Sent:  Saturday, May 18, 2002 16:18
To:  Wan, Julian
Subject:  Re: reprint

Thank you.  I have now seen your article.

As a matter of interest, were you aware that the FDA had issued a
warning in respect of the Gomco clamp:

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/circumcision.html

This one states "... we are concerned that some serious device-related
complications have occurred. We received 105 reports of injuries
involving circumcision clamps between July 1996 and January 2000
<http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/#1>. These have included laceration,
hemorrhage, penile amputation, and urethral damage."

In message <77267925C48ED311AA2E0008C7916AA60DAED8A8 @kalmb01.kaleidahealth.org>, Wan, Julian <JWan@KaleidaHealth.Org> writes

>Dear Mr. Dalton:
>
>Thank you for your letter concerning the GOMCO reprint. I haven’t gotten
>them yet - there is a delay of some sort with the publisher - once they are
>in, I’ll mail you a copy; there just may be a small lag.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Julian Wan, MD

Dr Wan’s reply to the question of whether he was aware of the FDA warning.

-- Original message --
Subject:  reprin’
To:  ‘John D Dalton’  <john.dalton@herdwick.net>
From:  "Wan, Julian"  <JWan@KaleidaHealth.Org>
Date:  Sun, 19 May 2002 14:54:28 -0400
Message-ID:
<77267925C48ED311AA2E0008C7916AA60DAED8BF @kalmb01.kaleidahealth.org>

Dear Mr. Dalton,

Thank you very much for the note. I was aware of the various types of problems with both the Mogen and the GOMCO clamps, but not of this particular alert.

The Mogen and similar style clamps run the risk of a cross clamping injury and a blind cutting injury and have been reported in several articles in the urological literature. The GOMCO style clamps require good maintenance of the parts – damage due to wear particularly at the critical force bearing areas can be a problem – the older models were brass coated wit chrome, and could be deformed. The newer models are stainless steel and so are a bit more robust, but can develop sharp edges or burrs. Circumcision instrument trays are often created with different size clamps, and sometimes inexperienced personnel can mix up the components – a mismatched bell and plate can lead to distortion of the clamping force and problems. I suspect the critical common theme in these injuries is the experience of the surgeon. The inexperienced and occasional circumciser is most likely to have problems.

Sincerely,

Julian Wan, MD

It seems strange that if Dr Wan was aware of "the various types of problems with both the Mogen and the GOMCO clamps", and that the older models were prone to warping, he did not refer to these problems in his article.

Gomco-like device banned

A "Gomco-like" device made in Pakistan and sold to the USA was actually recalled by the distributor in February 2000.

PRODUCT
Chrome plated brass circumcision clamps, gomco like, made in Pakistan, individually packaged clamps in boxes labeled only with the catalog number, description, size and quantity.
Recall #Z-402/404-0.
CODE
All units of the following clamps
Catalog #83928, 1.1 cm, Extra Small
Catalog #83929, 1.3 cm, Newborn
Catalog #83930, 1.6 cm, Child.
MANUFACTURER
Gogi Enterprises, Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan.
RECALLED BY
Medco Instruments, Inc., Crestwood, Illinois, by fax on February 16, 2000.

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ENFORCE/ENF00632.html


One operator's confession

Just how tricky the Gomco clamp can be, and how gruesome, is revealed in this astonishing testimony given by Dr Sunita Kantak in the course of a civil action for damages arising from a circumcision she performed in North Dakota, USA. Dr Kantak had circumcised a newborn boy using the Gomco method. Although she had obtained the mother's consent, the parents were horrified when they saw the result - an ugly and disfigured penis marked by a wound that required a long period to heal. They then sued the doctor and the hospital on the ground  that they had not been warned that there was any risk of disfigurement, stating that they would never have agreed to the operation had they been given full information about the process and the possible result.

In her testimony, Dr Kantak makes the extraordinary admission that in order to fasten the foreskin to the cone (here referred to as the bell) of the Gomco device, she pierced the baby's foreskin with several safety pins. She also states that she left the clamp on the crushed foreskin for seven minutes to ensure that there would be minimal bleeding when she used a scalpel to sever the foreskin and then removed the clamp.

The relevant section of her testimony is reproduced here. She is replying to questions from Zenas Baer, attorney for the plaintiffs.


        22             Q.   Now, Dr. Kantak,  on page 22 I asked
        23      you at Interrogatory Number 90 of Exhibit 16
        24      what the circumcision tray consisted of, and you
        25      describe it as including straight mosquito 
         1        forceps?
 
         2             A.   Yeah.
 
         3             Q.   And then a straight Kellie forcep.
         4      What is a Kellie forcep?
 
         5             A.   Kellie forcep is for to clean the
         6      area for the -- to use the sterile, you know,
         7      the Betadine that we clean the area before doing
         8      the circumcision.
 
         9             Q.   Okay.  Is there one mosquito forcep,
        10      or two?
 
        11             A.   I think there are three, three.
 
        12             Q.   Okay.  Three.  Maybe I can just
        13      refer you to the next page.  I think that has a
        14      more detailed description of what it contains.
 
        15      What are safety pins used for?
 
        16             A.   The safety pins are used just to
        17      hold the bell.  Some people use it, some people
        18      don't.
 
        19             Q.   Hold the what?
 
        20             A.   To hold the bell.
 
        21             Q.   The Gomco?
 
        22             A.   The Gomco bell.
 
        23             Q.   Hold it?
 
        24             A.   To hold it so it becomes easy to put
        25      it without much manipulation.
 
         1             Q.   Where do you put the safety pins?
 
         2             A.   Just on the tip where the -- you
         3      hold the bell.
 
         4             Q.   Do the safety pins puncture the
         5      foreskin that you're going to remove?
 
         6             A.   Yeah.
 
         7             Q.   So you actually pull up -- or you
         8      position the bell, and then you take safety pins
         9      and push them through the foreskin you're going
        10      to remove, and then attach or secure the safety
        11      pin so that the bell stays in place?
 
        12             A.   No.  Because you have to put the
        13      hole -- the -- the instruments of the Gomco
        14      apparatus, otherwise people use the -- what is
        15      that called?  I don't know what that's called.
        16      They use some other things to pull it out from
        17      the hole where the bell goes, so if you hold the
        18      bell, the safety pins, it just becomes -- you
        19      don't manipulate much and you get less bleeding,
        20      is my experience.
 
        21             Q.   But the safety pins do puncture the
        22      foreskin?
 
        23             A.   Yeah.
 
        24             Q.   And what is the med cup used for?
        25      What is that?
 
         1             A.   To prep balls, they have some cotton
         2      balls there and the nurse puts the Betadine and
         3      then you clean the area before you do the
         4      surgery so that there is no infection risk.  It
         5      reduces the infection risk.
 
         6             Q.   Okay.  And the scalpel, is that used
         7      to cut the foreskin once you have --
 
         8             A.   That's right.
 
         9             Q.   -- detached it and clamped it?
 
        10             A.   Yeah.
 
        11             Q.   And obtained hemostasis?
 
        12             A.   Yes.
 
        13             Q.   How can you tell when hemostasis has
        14      been achieved?
 
        15             A.   Usually the bleeding time is seven
        16      to nine minutes, so that's why I just go for
        17      seven minutes.  That's my preference to wait.

Cass District Court, State of North Dakota, USA, Court File CV-99-03761, deposition taken on 6 September 2000, by Carolyn's Reporting Service; transcript p. 148-51.


Gomco clamp as an S&M toy

The big advantage of the Gomco device for Yellen and his ob-gyns is that it helped to make circumcision a routine operation which could be performed by any GP, medical student, intern or obstetrician; it was no longer the preserve of specialist surgeons or those who knew something about male anatomy. This gain in efficiency and simplicity came at a heavy price that was paid by the one party to the transaction who could do nothing but scream: the baby boy. There can be little doubt that the new method was the most painful yet devised, requiring first the agonising process of tearing the foreskin from the infant glans, then crushing the foreskin, then cutting it off, then putting in stitches if necessary, and all performed without anaesthetic. Although the procedure is described as "quick", it often takes 20 minutes or longer.

It is doubtful whether any of the thumbscrews found in the dungeons of the Inquisition, and used to torture heretics in the Middle Ages, could have produced so much agony for so little effort on the part of the operator. (Indeed, Jewish doctors have plausibly asserted that the Gomco clamp is far more painful than both traditional Jewish circumcision methods and many other instruments, such as the Mogen clamp.)

It is thus hardly surprising that the Gomco clamp has become a prop and sex toy in the sexual dungeons and play rooms of those who specialise in the more extreme reaches of S&M, and particularly for those who get a sexual kick out of genital surgery and mutilations. Examples can be found all over the Internet:

Chase Union, a supplier of S&M gear, sells not only Gomco clamps, but castration equipment.
http://www.chaseunion.com/

A circumcision fetish site (pornography masquerading as medical advice and cultural studies) has pages in praise of the Gomco.
http://www.circlist.com/instrstechs/instrumentset.html

These fetishistic aspects are made very clear in this page of images and "hot" stories involving voluntary or forced circumcision:  (Warning: sexually explicit)
http://www.icon.co.za/~hugot/circum/circum.htm

And there are several internet communities devoted to the thrill of circumcision and the various instruments used in its performance, including one specifically in praise of the Gomco.

http://groups.msn.com/CIRCUMCISEDGUYS

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Gomco_circumcision_adult


Further information

Any web search will bring up thousands of pages on the subject. More sober information may be obtained from

http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/

http://www.circumstitions.com/Glossary2.html

http://www.noharmm.org/instruments.htm

The perspective of the American medical establishment, as it was in 1998, may be viewed here.

http://www.aafp.org/afp/980915ap/peleg.html





back to top

Homepage
Introduction
NEWS
Australia
Britain
USA
Ritual/Religious
Female
Chronology
Quotes
About me